What a disappointment. I somehow feel this game had so much potential, yet was somehow redesigned from scratch several times and then rush to market. The game try to be 5 games, yet fails in everyone of them. The more "polished" and incredible part of the game, is the designer. The rest, in my opinion, is an environment to try-out your creature, get bored, go back to the creature designer and do it again. Repeat ad nauseum.
But all is not lost for Maxis / EA. They obviously spent a lot of time on the editor and the creatures themselves. A lot of people have bought the game or just the creature creator. They "seeded" the spore-o-pedia database with a lot of creatures, vehicles, buildings,and spaceships from all the players. A MASSIVE amount of content.
I think the analogy with UT2003/ UT2004 is the best example of was I'm trying to get at. UT2003 was more a tech demo trying to sell the engine behind it. UT2004 had the same engine, yet was much more popular and more polished . Now place Spore in the place of UT2003. Most of what Spore need to be a good game is already there: it just need more polish... and, maybe a complete redesign of every phase...
For a complete (and good) review, see the Zero Punctuation one
At least the National Geographic documentary that came with the Galactic edition was entertaining...
Blogged with the Flock Browser
No comments:
Post a Comment